GH Releasers

MK677 and Ipamorelin are both selective agonists of the ghrelin receptor. Ipamorelin is a peptide analogue of ghrelin whereas MK677 is an unusual molecule that doesn’t fit into any specific category (it isn’t a peptide). These two compounds, while affecting a similar receptor, have different properties and produce different biochemical results. Many people are interested in the differences between MK677 vs Ipamorelin. Below is a look at how these compounds differ as well as how they are alike.

MK677 vs Ipamorelin

MK677, also known as Ibuatmoren and Oratrope, is an orally active, non-peptide, selective agonist of the ghrelin receptor. MK677 shares no structural similarities with ghrelin and therefore no structural similarities with Ipamorelin. Research shows that MK677 increases the secretion of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) without affecting cortisol levels. It is currently under investigation for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency, muscle wasting, bone wasting, and appetite stimulation. MK677 has a long half-life and once-daily dosing in most trial settings.

Ipamorelin is a peptide analogue of ghrelin that stimulates the secretion of GH. It is among the most selective of ghrelin analogs with research revealing no effect on ACTH, prolactin, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, or cortisol levels. Ipamorelin has been investigated in the treatment of GH deficiency, muscle wasting, and post-surgical ileus. It has also been the subject of numerous clinical trials for its ability to increase bone strength and mineralization.

BPC-157 vs TB-500

BPC-157 and TB-500 are both potent healing peptides with vast amounts of research investigating their properties and potential uses. Both are also synthetic derivatives of naturally occurring proteins that have been modified to enhance their already abundant features. Both peptides have been shown to improve immune function, enhance healing throughout the body, and even thwart the ravages of age in some ways. Still, BPC-157 vs TB-500 is a valid comparison as these two peptides are not the same and do not share all of the same functions. Below is a look at why someone might choose BPC-157 over TB-500 or vice versa. 

BPC-157 vs TB-500: General Wound Healing

Both TB-500 and BPC-157 have been shown to accelerate wound healing and tissue repair. BPC-157, a derivative of body protection compound (BPC), has a dose-dependent effect on the growth and migration of fibroblasts, the cells responsible for extracellular matrix repair[1]. TB-500, a derivative of thymosin beta-4 (Tβ-4) has a similar effect that it produces by manipulating actin filaments. Actin is a protein that plays central roles in cell reproduction and migration. Research shows that TB-500 can increase the rate of fibroblast growth and migration as well as boost health and migration of cells of the immune system.